Hibberd v. Smith
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Fourth Judicial District, San Francisco County.
1Opinion of the CourtCrockett, J.
— If the facts are correctly found by the court, it is manifest the title of the demanded premises is in the plaintiffs. The title having been finally confirmed to Antonio Peralta, and the facts as found showing a regular deraignment by mesne conveyances from Peralta to the plaintiffs, they are clearly entitled to recover on these facts, unless the action is barred by the statute of limitations. But the defendants insist that some of the material facts found by the court are not justified by the evidence. The plaintiffs deraign their title through a judgment, execution sale and sheriff’s deed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hunt v. LoucksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Chapin & Mastick v. BroderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Fitch v. BunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Hihn v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Downer v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Root v. ConlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924