Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Brockton Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action of tort for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while engaged in learning the duties of a conductor upon the defendant’s road in anticipation of being so employed by it. The declaration is in three coupts: the first for negligently placing and maintaining a post in its *455roadbed so near the rail, that the plaintiff while walking on the running board of a car in the discharge of his duty came in contact with it and received the injuries complained of; the second under St. 1887, c. 270, for a defect in the ways and works which arose from or had not been discovered in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lemoine v. AldrichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Weisser v. Southern Pacific Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Moore v. Chattanooga Electric Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Cross v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Kempton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Withee v. Somerset Traction Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API