Legal Opinion

Bank of Palo Alto v. Pacific Postal Tel. Cable Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided July 11, 1900No. 12,760PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action at law ior the recovery of money paid out on a fraudulent telegraphic order, and t.o obtain damages for fraudulent conversion.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

This is an action at law brought by a California corporation, as plaintiff, to recover from a Yew York corporation, as defendant, (1) a sum of money paid out hy the plaintiff upon a fraudulent telegraphic orden* sent over the defendant’s wires hy an employé of the defendant; (2) the amount expended hy the plaintiff in counsel fees and sundry expenses incurred in the endeavor to recover the money; and (3) to obtain punitive damages. The suit was first brought in the superior court of the state of California for the county of Santa Clara. Thereafter the cause was removed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Bank of Batavia v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Stephenson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bank of Cal. v. W. Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blair v. Guarantee Title Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Greenough v. United States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1922
  3. Gerlach Live Stock Co. v. LaxaltNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Wise v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1934
  5. United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API