Legal Opinion

Wise v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 26, 1934No. 34PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

It is conceded that this case is one of first impression and there is some suggestion in the briefs that the acknowledged novelty of the action may be a limitation upon the right to maintain it.

I am of the opinion that the correct answer to the suggestion lies in a determination of whether the term “novelty” applies to the legal principle forming the basis of the action or whether the legal basis being recognized, the “novelty” has application merely to the method by which the principle is enforced. If there be no known legal principle upon which…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Seith v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Hartnett v. Boston StoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. Garber v. WhittakerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
  3. Buchanan v. CritesUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Claudio BallardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API