Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Rome

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1915No. 5835PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Eeece. June 4, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.

The plaintiff in error, Frank Smith, brought an action for damages against the City of Eome, averring in his petition that on November 6, 1912, while confined in the chain-gang of the city, and compelled by the authorities to work in the rock-*97quarry of the municipality, he was directed by the boss of the chain-gang to do certain work, in common with two other convicts, in drilling holes in the rock, for blasting; that he was compelled to hold a certain steel drill, some two and a half or three feet long, while the two other convicts struck upon the top of this drill with large hammers, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  2. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Cochrell v. Langley Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Irwin v. ArrendaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Hardie v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Ivins v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Cadranel v. Wildwood Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Hall County v. LogginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API