Legal Opinion

State v. . Charles

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

The three counts in the indictment charge the defendant with having received on 15 December, 1927, certain goods, chattels and moneys, knowing them to have been stolen. He was acquitted on the last two counts and convicted on the first. From the sentence pronounced he appealed, assigning error.

There was evidence that the stolen goods had been delivered to the defendant on different occasions, and for this reason he made a motion to quash the indictment and to require the solicitor to elect as to the count on which he would proceed. Both motions were declined. It will be noted that…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API