Legal Opinion

Shimon v. Silberman

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin Schneier, J.

*911The primary issue presented in this arbitration proceeding is: were the bifurcated arbitration proceedings employed by the rabbinical court which first determined liability in its “Partial Decision” and then in its final “Decision” determined the amount of the debt owed by respondents to petitioner enforceable? This is apparently an issue of first impression in this state.

In this special proceeding petitioner, Cheskel Shimon, petitions the court for an order pursuant to CPLR 7510 confirming the award of the arbitrators and pursuant to CPLR 7514, for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wien & Malkin LLP v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Peckerman v. D & D AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Erin Construction & Development Co. v. MeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Jones v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shimon v. SilbermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Matter of Franco v. DweckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API