Legal Opinion
Shimon v. Silberman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 14, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The appeal from the intermediate order dated May 13, 2010, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order dated May 13, 2010, are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CELR 5501 [a] [1]).
The Supreme Court did not err in confirming the subject arbitration award, in denying the motion of Herman Silberman, *790also known as Zvi Elimelach Silberman, and Chaim Silberman (hereinafter together the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Meisels v. UhrNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Board of Education v. Niagara-Wheatfield Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- New York City Transit Authority v. Transport Workers Union of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dermigny v. HarperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Mahoney v. BrockbankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016