Legal Opinion
In Re McNeil
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 21, 1981No. 14-23698PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION TO VACATE ORDER REOPENING CASE
JEREMIAH E. BERK, Bankruptcy Judge.
This is a motion by the BANK OF COMMERCE pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, made applicable herein by Bankruptcy Rule 924, 1 411 U.S. 1102, to vacate an ex parte order dated February 6, 1981 reopening the case of the joint Chapter 7 debtors.
FACTS
The basic facts as determined from argument on the motion are not in dispute. On April 1, 1980 the debtors filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978. In Schedule A-2 they listed the Dartmouth…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milando v. PerroneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Lansing Liquidation Corp. v. HeinzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Bekins v. Compton-Delevan Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- In re OsofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
3Cited by29 opinions
- Washington Medical Center, Inc. v. HolleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- State Bank of India v. Chalasani (In re Chalasani)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- In Re ChalasaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- In Re CruzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- In Re IannaconeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.