Lansing Liquidation Corp. v. Heinze
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Arthur P. Heinze and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 23d day of June, 1917, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 26th day of June, 1917, denying defendants’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment for $335,098.43, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial under section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The plaintiff alleges that on or about the 9th day of September, 1907, the 2Etna Indemnity Company of Hartford, Conn., *131loaned and advanced to the defendants Arthur P. Heinze, Otto C. Heinze and Max H. Schultze, doing business as copartners under the firm name and style of Otto Heinze and Company, the sum of $256,500, which sum the defendants, as such copartners, jointly agreed to repay to the said iEtna Indemnity…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kreitlein v. FergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Horbach v. ArkellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- McKee v. PrebleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- New York Fastener Co. v. WilatusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re McNeilUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Patrikes v. J. C. H. Service Stations, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943
- STATE Ex Rel NILSEN v. BEANOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- In re OsofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Martin v. AckmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.