Legal Opinion

Gregory P. Violette and Barbara A. Violette v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC, et al.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided June 8, 2026No. 1:26-cv-00174Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE GREGORY P. VIOLETTE, and ) BARBARA A. VIOLETTE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 1:26-cv-00174-JAW ) CARRINGTON MORTGAGE ) SERVICES, LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER ON MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiffs seek to remand the case to state court, arguing defendants’ notice of removal was untimely, and they demand costs and fees for allegedly improper removal. Because the court concludes that plaintiffs never formally served the defendant, the removal statute’s thirty-day window did not begin to run, and defendants’ removal was timely. Thus, the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Danca v. Private Health Care Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  4. Novak v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co., NA.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. Ayres v. Jacobs & Crumplar, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API