Swales v. Township of Ravenna
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SAM H. BELL, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Now before the court is a motion for summary judgment filed- by Defendants Township of Ravenna, Ravenna Township Police Department, and Larry Carver. (Docket #32.) Plaintiffs Kelly and David Swales filed this action against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Ohio state law. Defendants argue that there are no genuine issue of material fact in this case, and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. For the reasons that follow, the court agrees, but only in part. Consequently, the court shall grant Defendants’ motion in part…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fox v. Van OosterumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Ohio State Highway PatrolDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- United States v. MullikinDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2006
- Franken Investments, Inc. v. City of FlintDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.