Legal Opinion

State v. Quinn

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 4, 1954No. 48358PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*848Mulroney, J.-

— -The question of general interest presented by this appeal by the State of Iowa from a directed verdict of acquittal is whether a partner’s obtaining partnership funds by false pretense constitutes the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses defined in section 713.1, Code, 1950. The record shows defendant and Harry W. Stanfield were partners doing business, under the name of Midwest Used Car Sales, in Ottumwa. The indictment charged that defendant “unlawfully, designedly, by means of false pretense and with intent to defraud [did] obtain from his then partner, Harry W.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  2. State v. LoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Gary v. Northwestern Mutual Aid Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. People v. CravensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. State v. SandersArizona Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SabinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  2. State v. SiersNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  4. Sertich v. MoormanArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. QuinnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API