Legal Opinion

In Re Bennethum

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 24, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

162 A.2d 429 (1960)

Matter of William H. BENNETHUM.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

June 24, 1960.

S. Samuel Arsht, Wilmington, for Censor Committee of the Supreme Court.

David B. Coxe, Jr., Wilmington, for William H. Bennethum.

2Per curiam

Counsel for respondent argues that the only evidence on which this Court made the finding of false swearing is the evidence presented in the federal criminal trial. Authority is cited for the proposition that the record of the case in which the perjured testimony was given is admissible only to prove the giving of the testimony and not to prove perjury. 70 C.J.S. Perjury § 59,…

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of SullivanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  2. In Re BennethumSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  3. In re BennethumDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
  4. In re BennethumDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API