Legal Opinion

Struble v. Meredith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 9, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

This is an action for partition of certain real estate of which one M. L. Struble died testate. By the terms of M. L. Struble’s will the plaintiff in error, L. Bert Struble, who was the plaintiff below, was devised a one-fifth interest therein. The petition avers that the Merediths claim an interest in the property by virtue of a purchase from the administrator de bonis non of the estate of M. L. Struble.

The Merediths answer to this pleading, and therein deny that the plaintiff has an interest in the premises. They aver that they are the fee simple owners thereof by purchase at public auction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schilling v. OdlebakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Winslow v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Felstead v. Eastern Shore Express, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Compton, Jr. v. ComptonOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Vida v. VidaOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API