Legal Opinion

Astorino v. New Jersey Transit Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 2006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KLEIN, J.:

¶ 1 Plaintiffs Giovanni Astorino, Sandra Astorino, Mark Shtraus, and Lilita Shtraus, who are all Pennsylvania residents, sued New Jersey Transit Corporation for injuries they suffered as a result of a commuter train derailment in Hudson County, New Jersey. The distinguished trial judge dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the trial judge deemed all issues waived because he held that the Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement was too vague to permit him to draft a Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion. We disagree, and we caution trial judges against…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Flamer v. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eiser v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. B.L. v. T.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. B.L. v. T.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. B.L. v. T.B. and F.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Eiser v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API