Legal Opinion
United States v. Mabry
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 3, 2008No. 06-2324, 06-2327PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which ROGERS, J., joined. KEITH, J. (pp. 450-53, delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.)
OPINION
ANN ALDRICH, District Judge.
Defendants-Appellants Walter Ralph Mabry and Anthony Michael were convicted and sentenced for conspiring to solicit and obtain prohibited payments from union contractors, and for soliciting and obtaining such payments, in violation of the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. § 186. On appeal, Mabry and Michael argue that (1) the district court erred in ruling that the term “settlement” under 29…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- United States v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Hance v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Leonhardt v. ArvinMeritor, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Sedgwick Insurance v. F.A.B.E. Custom Downstream Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.