Legal Opinion

Cadillac Automobile Motor No. 61-D-476 v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1925No. 4290PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

This was the petition of the United States to condemn one Cadillac automobile because it had been used in the removal and eoncealmennt of cocaine, with the intent to defraud the United States of the tax thereon, contrary to the provisions of section 3450, R. S.

The District Court ordered the condemnation. The automobile belonged to Elvira Bellomini, who appeared as claimant. Her brother, John Bellomini, was driving the car ■when it was seized. It was stipulated that *103Elvira had not authorized its use for, and had no reason to suppose it was to be used for, carrying…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  4. States v. ManganoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Chevrolet Truck, Motor No. 3802777District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1929
  2. United States v. Rudolph R. Bregman, and Milton H. L. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. One 1935 Model Chevrolet Coupé AutomobileDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
  4. United States v. One Chevrolet CoachDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1932
  5. United States v. One Ford V-8 Sedan, 1934 ModelDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API