Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Samuels

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 14, 1988No. 84 C 3385PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ANN C. WILLIAMS, District Judge.

On October 3, 1984, the plaintiffs Barry Fisher, Kenneth Fisher, Lloyd Berhoff, Richard Goldstein, and Marvin Kaufman filed a twelve count amended complaint against the defendants Howard Samuels, Eriador Drilling Partners (“Eriador”), Caliber Properties, Ltd. (“Caliber”), and Jubilee. Energy Corporation (“Jubilee”). 1 The amended complaint alleges causes of action under the federal securities laws, RICO and state law. The defendants have moved for summary judgment on all counts. For the following reasons, the court grants the motion…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brambles USA, Inc. v. BlockerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1990
  2. Jepson, Inc. And Ko Shin Electric and MacHinery Company, Ltd. v. Makita Corporation (F/k/a Makita Electric Works, Ltd.)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. In Re First Chicago Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  4. In Re VMS Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  5. Nichols Motorcycle Supply Inc. v. Dunlop Tire Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API