Legal Opinion

Robert Blood v. The City of New York and S. A. Healy Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 25, 1956No. 24108_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff is the owner of resort properties on the Delaware River about five miles downstream from the confluence of the Delaware and Neversink Rivers at Port Jervis, New York, and about forty-five miles below the Neversink Dam, constructed by defendant, S. A. Healy Company, for and under contract with defendant, the City of New York. Plaintiff’s complaint alleged negligence, nuisance and trespass in that the construction of the dam had rendered the water of the Delaware River, as it passed plaintiff’s property, so turbid and muddy that it violated his rights as property owner and interfered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Edward Shannon, C. W. Shannon and Arthur F. Simpson, Doing Business as Shannon & Simpson Casket CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tampa Wholesale Co. v. Foodtown, USA, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. United States v. Continental Can CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. Global Commerce Corporation, S. A. v. Clark-Babbitt Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API