Legal Opinion

State v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 1, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2299PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

The real party in interest was charged under A.R.S. Secs. 13-661, 13-662, 13-663, 13-671, 13-688 and 13-682 with grand theft by embezzlement of a motor vehicle. Based on State v. Thomas, 110 Ariz. 27, 514 P.2d 1023 (1973) the trial court granted his motion to dismiss without prejudice on the grounds that since a motor vehicle was involved, he should have been charged under A.R.S. Sec. 13-672(A) which states:

“It shall be unlawful for any person to take from another a motor vehicle with the intent to deprive either temporarily or permanently such other person of such motor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TauscherOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EdgarArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. M-R Sullivan Manufacturing Co. v. Sullivan (In Re Sullivan)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  3. Batin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Batin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API