Legal Opinion
Sarah v. Thompson
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 15, 2004No. 03-2633PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*771 ORDER
James G. Sarah appeals pro se from a district court judgment that dismissed his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Seeking monetary and equitable relief, Sarah filed this civil rights action against Brenda Thompson, a prison nurse. Sarah alleged that Thompson violated his First and Eighth Amendment rights by being deliberately indifferent to his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Gutierrez v. PetersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Angela Harrell v. Grainger County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Ashley v. GenoveseDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Barnett v. McCormickDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Benson v. Hardin County, TennesseeDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Bostic v. MehrDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.