Legal Opinion

United States v. Devon J. Bradford

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 13, 2001No. 99-3018, 99-3019, 99-3020, 99-3021, 99-3975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Devon J. Bradford, Dana E. Boswell, Howard L. Harrison, Phillip D. Banks, and Joseph D. Andrews, appeal their convictions and sentences that stem from a conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. The defendants raise a number of issues in this consolidated appeal, including the sufficiency of the evidence; whether the sentencing comported with Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000); whether one, or more than one, conspiracy was proven; whether the motions to sever should have been granted; various evidentiary rulings; and other…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. Fabian Aguayo-DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Gregory Charles Ervasti, United States of America v. Deniene "Dee" ErvastiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Devon Julian Bradford, Also Known as Devo, United States of America v. Dana E. Boswell, Also Known as Blue, United States of America v. Howard L. Harrison, Also Known as Big Bull, Also Known as Bull United States of America v. Phillip D. Banks, Also Known as Debo, Also Known as Philbo, United States of America v. Joseph D. Andrews, Also Known as Jo JoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API