Legal Opinion

McRae v. SECURITY PACIFIC HOUSING SERV.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 27, 1993No. 1921108PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Western Division, certified the following question of law to us:

"Does the last sentence of Ala. Code § 7-9-403(6) mean that a financing statement perfecting a security interest in a pre-1990 mobile home lapses after 5 years under Ala. Code § 7-9-403(2) where the financing statement does not state specifically that it will remain effective until a termination statement is filed or, contain other indicia of the maturity date of obligation beyond the 5-year period?"

The question of law presented is deemed determinative of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. v. City of HartselleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  2. Ex Parte Birmingham Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Tate v. TeagueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Eagerton v. Terra Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Harwell v. First National Bank of Wetumpka (In Re Sewell)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Regions Bank v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Bright v. CalhounSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  4. Ex Parte Alfa Financial CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ex Parte Miller, Hamilton, Snider & Odom, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API