Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Birmingham Bd. of Educ.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 15, 1992No. 1901618PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following facts are undisputed:

Verdell Hardy, a nonprobationary employee of the Birmingham Board of Education ("the Board"), was informed by the superintendent of the Birmingham Public Schools that the Board had voted to consider a proposal to terminate her employment, because she had allegedly struck a child in violation of the Board's corporal punishment policy. After a full evidentiary hearing before the Board, at which Ms. Hardy was represented by counsel, the Board voted to terminate her employment. At her request and pursuant to the Fair Dismissal Act, Ala. Code 1975, § 86-26-100 et…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HolladaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. State v. Calumet & Hecla Consol. Copper Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Bolton v. MOBILE CTY. BD. OF SCH. COM'RSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Washington v. Bessemer Bd. of Educ.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Ex Parte ClaytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Southeast Alabama Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  2. Ex Parte PanellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. McRae v. SECURITY PACIFIC HOUSING SERV.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. McLeod v. BeatyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  5. Davis v. JF Drake State Technical CollegeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API