Phillips v. Freyer
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Lumber-lien suit. Defendant lumber-owners bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiff owned a saw-mill, and carried on the business of manufacturing ’ lumber for other parties. Defendant Freyer contracted with the plaintiff to saw a •certain amount of logs for him at an agreed price per 1,000 feet. Plaintiff manufactured the logs into lumber, and piled it in his own yard. Freyer sold the lumber to defendants Champion and Hayward while it was in plaintiff's possession, in his mill-yard. Plaintiff was not paid for sawing the logs, and thereupon filed a statement •of lien under Act No. 229, Laws of 1887. He commenced an attachment suit in accordance with the provisions…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shaw v. BradleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Kieldsen v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore-Mansfield Construction Co v. Indianapolis, Newcastle & Toledo Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Quist v. SandmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Savings Bank v. MundtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Haughton v. BuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1894