Legal Opinion

In Re Roseboro

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1987No. 18-31846PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO MODIFY PLAN POST-CONFIRMATION AS TO HEILIG-MEYERS FURNITURE

MARVIN R. WOOTEN, Bankruptcy Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The debtor filed a petition under Chapter 13 in this Court on April 24, 1985 and his plan was subsequently confirmed. On April 21, 1986, June 5, 1986, June 12, 1986, August 2, 1986, August 7, 1986, and October 3, 1986, the debtor purchased various items of personal property from the Heilig-Meyers store in Shelby, North Carolina. For each such sale, Heilig-Meyers retained a purchase money security interest in the items purchased. The items of personal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re PritchettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1985
  2. Hester v. Powell (In Re Hester)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re BanksUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1993
  2. Piedmont Trust Bank v. Linkous (In Re Linkous)District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1992
  3. RTO Rents v. Benson (In Re Benson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  4. In Re GloverUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
  5. In Re GoodmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API