Legal Opinion

State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Associated Auto & Truck Rental, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1971No. 1270A254PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

This court has made an unfortunate mistake in its interpretation of Rule A.P. 7.2(A) (1) (a) in the case of Thonert v. Daenell (1970), 148 Ind. App. 70, 263 N. E. 2d 749.

Rule A.P. 7.2(A) (1) (a) reads as follows:

“In all appeals from a final judgment, a certified copy of the motion to correct errors filed with the trial court shall constitute for all purposes the assignment of errors. No assignment of error other than the motion to correct errors shall be included in the record.”

In regard to this rule this court stated in Thonert at 263 N. E. 2d at page 750:

“We further note that the transcript…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thonert v. DaenellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Insurance Company v. ClintonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Smith v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. National Bank & T. Co. of So. Bend v. Moody FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Pavach v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Nyers v. GruberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API