Legal Opinion

Thonert v. Daenell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1970No. 770A119PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before us on the appellees’ Motion to Dismiss or Affirm. Appellees allege in their motion various defects in the transcript of the record and in the appellants’ brief. The critical alleged defect concerning the transcript is that it does not contain a certified copy of the motion to correct errors nor of any other papers, for the reason that the clerk’s certificates are without a seal.

We have examined the clerk’s certificate and find it does not bear the seal of the Court. It is a fundamental principle that it is the certificate of the clerk which gives verity to the transcript…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Public Service Commission v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. MinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Robinson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Lipps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Cammack v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Insurance Company v. ClintonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Smith v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Anderson v. Indiana State Employees' Appeals CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. National Bank & T. Co. of So. Bend v. Moody FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Pavach v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API