Legal Opinion

James C. Gionfriddo, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 10, 2012No. 11-13336UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

On April 8, 2011, James C. Gionfriddo Jr. received notice from the Social Security Administration that it would not review the administrative law judge’s decision to deny him social security benefits. He filed a pro se complaint in federal district court on July 5, 2011, 1 and asked to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The district court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim because it found that the complaint had been filed twenty-two days too late. Gionfriddo appeals, proceeding pro se.

We review de novo a dismissal under 28…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ned Hughes v. Charles LottCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Latimer v. Roaring Toyz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Cecil R. SHOWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Draeger v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2025
  2. Quinn S. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2026
  3. Sulzner v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API