Legal Opinion
Massachusetts Ex Rel. Division of Marine Fisheries v. Daley
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided February 24, 1999No. 98-1917PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts (“the Commonwealth”) brought this action in the district court to review a decision of the Secretary of Commerce (“the Secretary”) adopting a revised quota for catching seup off the East Coast of the United States. The district court held the quota unlawful insofar as it allocated the summer catch of scup on a state-by-state basis. The Secretary now appeals.
Seup, also known as porgy, are small migrating fish that school off the Atlantic coast from North Carolina to Massachusetts. In the winter, they swim off-shore from New Jersey…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Department of Public Welfare v. Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- North Carolina Fisheries Ass'n, Inc. v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Doe v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Tempest Fisheries v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Oregon Trollers Ass'n v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.