Legal Opinion

Geather v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 10, 1964No. 4699PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The order here appealed, denying appellant’s motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, was based in part upon the lower court’s determination that:

“ * * * The right of an indigent defendant to court-appointed counsel in a state criminal trial as established by the Supreme Court of the United States of America in the case of Gideon vs. Wainwright, 372 US 335 [83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799], overruling Betts vs. Brady, 316 US 455 [62 S.Ct. 1252, 86 L.Ed. 1595], has no application in the case at bar, inasmuch as the United States Supreme Court did not decide…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Harry Craig v. David N. Myers, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Graterford, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  5. Fauls v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. O'Lock v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Manning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Falagon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API