Popkin v. Gindlesperger
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.
We have been asked to interpret Section 3-107(d) of the Public Safety Article, Maryland Code (2003, 2011 Repl.Vol.), 1 a provision included in the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (“LEOBR”), to determine whether a deputy sheriff can compel, by the issuance of a subpoena, the production of documents and records in advance of a disciplinary hearing. In this case, Deputy Erick Gindlesperger of the Montgomery County Sheriffs Office had filed a subpoena request seeking to compel Sheriff Darren M. Popkin 2 to produce documents prior to a disciplinary hearing under the LEOBR. The hearing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Blondell v. Baltimore City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Abbott v. Administrative Hearing BoardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Robinson v. Baltimore Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Miller v. Baltimore County Police DepartmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ellsworth v. Baltimore Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Foy v. Baltimore City Detention Ctr.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Ellsworth v. Baltimore Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014