Legal Opinion

Popkin v. Gindlesperger

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 26, 2012No. 104, September Term, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

We have been asked to interpret Section 3-107(d) of the Public Safety Article, Maryland Code (2003, 2011 Repl.Vol.), 1 a provision included in the Law Enforcement Officers’ Bill of Rights (“LEOBR”), to determine whether a deputy sheriff can compel, by the issuance of a subpoena, the production of documents and records in advance of a disciplinary hearing. In this case, Deputy Erick Gindlesperger of the Montgomery County Sheriffs Office had filed a subpoena request seeking to compel Sheriff Darren M. Popkin 2 to produce documents prior to a disciplinary hearing under the LEOBR. The hearing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Blondell v. Baltimore City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. Abbott v. Administrative Hearing BoardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Robinson v. Baltimore Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Miller v. Baltimore County Police DepartmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellsworth v. Baltimore Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Foy v. Baltimore City Detention Ctr.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Ellsworth v. Baltimore Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API