Legal Opinion

Lombardo v. Atkinson-Kiewit

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 1, 2000No. 98-103-M.PPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLANDERS, Justice.

This workers’ compensation case concerns the modern status of the so-called odd-lot doctrine.1 Traditionally, permanently but only partially disabled employees were nevertheless entitled to recover total-disability benefits if, in light of their dimmed employment prospects after suffering a work-related injury, they were deemed unable to perform their regular job or any alternative employment. Such employees, it was said, were an “odd lot” in the labor market and therefore entitled to collect compensation benefits as if they were totally and permanently disabled. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Montuori v. Narragansett Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  2. State v. HealySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Hughes v. Saco Casting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  4. Correia v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  5. Corry v. Commissioned Officers' Mess (Open)Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Norton v. CourtemancheSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. City of Pawtucket v. PimentalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. Blais v. the Beacon Mutual Ins. CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  4. Bechtel Corp. v. PonteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. Athenaeum Row Condominm. Asso. v. KellySuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API