Legal Opinion

City of Pawtucket v. Pimental

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 15, 2008No. 2007-106-M.PPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SUTTELL, for the Court.

We issued a writ of certiorari to review a decision by the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Court (Appellate Division) upholding the reduction of Michael Pimental’s workers’ compensation benefits under G.L. 1956 § 28-33-18(b). 1 The Appellate Division affirmed the trial judge’s ruling that the partially incapacitated employee’s refusal to undergo surgery that had a reasonable likelihood of improving his condition was an insufficient reason for forestalling a “maximum medical improvement” (MMI) determination and the attendant reduction of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brennan v. KirbySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  5. Matter of Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GermaneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. Nat'l Educ. Ass'n R.I. v. Town of MiddletownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
  3. In Re All Individual Kugel Mesh CasesSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  4. In Re BriggsSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  5. National Education Association Rhode Island v. Town of Middletown, by and through its Finance Director, Lynn DibleSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API