Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 93
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 18, 2017No. Case Number: 114825PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINCHESTER, J.,
¶ 1 This cause has been appealed previously. In that appeal the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the trial court’s judgment vacating an arbitration decision, which judgment had been appealed by the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 93, and Kendra Miller. City of Tulsa v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 93, 2016 OK CIV APP 4, 365 P.3d 82. This Court denied certiorari on January 12, 2016.
¶ 2 Subsequent to the issue of the mandate, the Lodge and Miller moved to remand the matter to the arbitrator; The trial judge denied the motion, and again those two parties appealed. This Court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- STATE ex rel. PRUITT v. NATIVE WHOLESALE SUPPLYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Meekins v. Department of Institutions, Social & Rehabilitative ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- City of Tulsa v. Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 93Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- Hays v. L. C. I., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- CITY OF TULSA v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023
- CITY OF TULSA v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- CITY OF TULSA v. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2023