Legal Opinion

Finley v. Riley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1923No. 11276PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, O.

Plaintiff assigns four grounds of error, as follows:

“First. Said court committed error in sustaining the demurrer to the amended petition and rendering judgment sustaining the demurrer on the ground that said petition showed upon its face that the cause of action therein set out and stated is barred by the statute of limitation of the state of Oklahoma.
“Second. Said court committed error in sustaining the demurrer to the amended petition, and in rendering judgment sustaining the demurrer on the ground that said cause of action shows on its face that the cause of action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Balbridge v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Board of Com'rs of Garfield County v. RenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Lusk v. Porter, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Stauffer v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Washington v. World Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Okfuskey v. CorbinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Weston v. Acme Tool, IncorporatedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Caraway v. OverholserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Fox v. OvertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API