Jean Cunningham v. Novo Nordisk
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
Jean Cunningham appeals the District Court’s order granting summary judgment to Novo Nordisk on her employment discrimination claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C; § 12101 et seq., and her retaliation claim under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. We will affirm, essentially for the reasons stated by the District Court in its thoughtful opinion.
I
Cunningham is a registered nurse and works as a manáger in the product safety department at Novo Nordisk, a pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical company, where she…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lichtenstein v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Curtis Blaine Storey v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jakomas v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Allen v. The Hershey CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- D.P. Becknauld v. PA Dept. of AgricultureCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Dylan Sturgis v. Diamond Hospitality Services LLC and Penn State Cobblestone, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- GARDNER v. SEPTADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.