Legal Opinion

Jean Cunningham v. Novo Nordisk

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 11, 2015No. 14-2640UnpublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.

Jean Cunningham appeals the District Court’s order granting summary judgment to Novo Nordisk on her employment discrimination claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C; § 12101 et seq., and her retaliation claim under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. We will affirm, essentially for the reasons stated by the District Court in its thoughtful opinion.

I

Cunningham is a registered nurse and works as a manáger in the product safety department at Novo Nordisk, a pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical company, where she…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Lichtenstein v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  5. Curtis Blaine Storey v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jakomas v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. Allen v. The Hershey CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. D.P. Becknauld v. PA Dept. of AgricultureCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Dylan Sturgis v. Diamond Hospitality Services LLC and Penn State Cobblestone, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
  5. GARDNER v. SEPTADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API