Legal Opinion

Russell v. Williams

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 18, 1882No. 105PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

This is an action brought for the recovery of duties alleged to have been illegally imposed.

The following is the agreed statement of facts, so far as necessary to understand the case.

Williams & Hall, in February and April, 1871, imported into the port of Boston from Liverpool nine hundred and eighty-eight packages of tea, the’ product of China, and entered, the same in warehouse under bond. At various subsequent dates they withdrew the tea for consumption. Russell, th'e collector of customs, assessed, and they paid him, duties thereon at the rate of fifteen cents per pound, and in addition a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hadden v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Gautier v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bond v. DustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. Rush v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  4. Harris v. NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Duncan v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API