Legal Opinion
Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided January 17, 2003No. Bankruptcy No. 98-02632-6C7, Adversary No. 01-170PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO TRANSMIT CONTEMPT MATTER TO THE DISTRICT COURT
C. Timothy CORCORAN, III, Bankruptcy Judge.
This adversary proceeding came on for consideration of the plaintiffs motion for order of contempt filed on November 27, 2002 (Document No. 128 and its exhibits, Document No. 136).
In the motion, the plaintiff seeks an order holding the defendants, Paula Lick-man and James F. Wiley, III, in contempt of this court for their failure to comply with the provisions of this court’s Final Order on Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions for Violation of Preliminary Injunction entered on August…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jove Engineering, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Glatter v. MrozCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- In the Matter of Hipp, Inc., Debtor. Thomas J. Griffith, Trustee v. David OlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Stephan Jay Lawrence v. Alan L. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Henkel v. Lickman (In Re Lickman)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
- In Re Wvf Acquisition, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2009