Legal Opinion

Jahn v. Perlberg

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 31, 1984PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SANDERS, Judge.

In this action to recover interim co-executor’s fees, the Petitioner has appealed from the decision of the Hamilton County Chancery Court, which denied his claim for fees.

In. September, 1966, the now-deceased Daniel I. Perlberg executed a will. In pertinent part, this will provided:

“V.
“I HEREBY NOMINATE, DIRECT and APPOINT my beloved wife, Dora Kauff-man Perlberg, Meyer Winer, and David Winer, as Co-Executors of this will, and if either of them shall die, resign, be disqualified or become unwilling or unable to serve, then the remaining two (2) shall act as Co-Executors,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fox v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Moore v. NeelyTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Estate of BodgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Third National Bank in Nashville v. First American National Bank of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Adams v. MellenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Beaty v. McGrawCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Estate of Ladd v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  3. Perlberg v. JahnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  4. Beatty v. McGrawCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. Chris Cagle v. Mark J. HybnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API