Legal Opinion

Moody v. Hinton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 10, 1992No. 1910615PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The undisputed facts are as follows:

Claridge at Hanover Partners, an Alabama general partnership ("Claridge") borrowed $4,025,000 from Central Bank of the South ("the Bank"). Claridge at Hanover, Inc., and Hinton Properties, Inc., the general partners of Claridge, executed the note evidencing the loan. John Robert Moody and Rebecca B. Moody are officers of Claridge at Hanover, Inc. Thomas F. Hinton is president of Hinton Properties. The promissory note was secured by a mortgage on real property and by a "Continuing Guaranty (Unlimited)" given by each of the Moodys and by Hinton. Claridge…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pilalas v. BALDWIN COUNTY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'NSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Layne v. GarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Cowen v. M.S. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Zaden v. ElkusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Ex Parte CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Lyles v. Pioneer Housing Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API