Farwell v. Webster
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Barron County. Garnishment. The plaintiffs, who are judgment creditors of John Lindstrom and William Cholerton, appealed from a judgment in favor of the garnishee. The facts will sufficiently appear from the opinion. [No appearance for the respondent.]
1Opinion of the Court
Cole, 0. J.
The garnishee claimed to hold the property of the principal debtors under a voluntary assignment made by them for the benefit of creditors. The assignors, Lindstrom and Cholerton, -were doing a mercantile business *486at Chetek, in Barron county. We infer from the evidence that Lindstrom had charge of the business and managed it for the firm, and that his partner resided at Bichiand Center, quite a distance from Chetek. It appears that Lindstrom executed the assignment at Chetek on Saturday, the 24th of January, 1885, and Cholerton executed it on Sunday, at Bichiand Center. On Monday,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rumery v. McCullochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
- Coleman v. DarlingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Brooks v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by7 opinions
- O'Day v. MeyersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Bergland v. FrawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Hanson v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Corbett v. CannonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
- Ford v. ClarkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.