Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 8, 2005No. A05A0300PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

Quitman Clark appeals his conviction for aggravated assault, enumerating five errors. He contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient; (2) the trial court erred in excluding a defense witness;(3) the trial court erred in forcing him to choose whether to continue the case or try it without his witness; (4) his counsel was ineffective; and (5) the court’s Allen charge was unduly coercive. For the reasons that follow, we affirm his conviction.

1. We view the evidence on appeal in the light most favorable to the verdict, and no longer presume the defendant is innocent. We do not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Burchette v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. Goldsby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Drogan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. Ferrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API