Legal Opinion

Borough of Rainsburg v. Fyan

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1889No. 89PublishedCited by 15 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP BEDFORD ' COUNTY. No. 89 January Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 140 September Term 1887, C. P. On May 23, 1887, the defendant entered an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace in an action by Albert E. Fyan against the borough of Rainsburg, to recover interest upon borough bonds held by the plaintiff, dated February 27, 1886. Issue.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE COURT OP COMMON PLEAS OP BEDFORD ' COUNTY. No. 89 January Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 140 September Term 1887, C. P. On May 23, 1887, the defendant entered an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace in an action by Albert E. Fyan against the borough of Rainsburg, to recover interest upon borough bonds held by the plaintiff, dated February 27, 1886. Issue. The cause was tried on January 4,1888, before Baer, P. J., without a jury, under the provisions of the act of April 22, 1874, P. L. 109, and on July 17, 1888, the following decision was filed: From the…

1Per curiam

This judgment is affirmed upon the opinion of the learned judge of the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Luzerne Township v. Fayette CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Georges Township v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Long v. Lemoyne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Wade v. Oakmont BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Ohlinger v. Maidencreek TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API