Board of Education v. Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 48} It is undisputed that due to Circuit City’s mistaken belief that it was located within the Cleveland Municipal School District, the North Olmsted schools were deprived of approximately $74,849 of tax revenue. Nevertheless, the majority holds that North Olmsted may not recover any of these tax proceeds. I respectfully disagree.
{¶ 49} North Olmsted filed a complaint seeking to recover the tax proceeds under a theory of unjust enrichment. The majority holds that North Olmsted cannot recover based primarily on two points.
{¶ 50} Relying upon Lyme Twp. Bd. of Edn. v. Lyme Twp. Special School…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stern v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Santos v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Lien v. HouseOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. WestOhio Supreme Court · 1993