Legal Opinion · Dissent

Board of Education v. Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 2006No. 2005-0132Published

1DissentLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 48} It is undisputed that due to Circuit City’s mistaken belief that it was located within the Cleveland Municipal School District, the North Olmsted schools were deprived of approximately $74,849 of tax revenue. Nevertheless, the majority holds that North Olmsted may not recover any of these tax proceeds. I respectfully disagree.

{¶ 49} North Olmsted filed a complaint seeking to recover the tax proceeds under a theory of unjust enrichment. The majority holds that North Olmsted cannot recover based primarily on two points.

{¶ 50} Relying upon Lyme Twp. Bd. of Edn. v. Lyme Twp. Special School…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Stern v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Santos v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State Ex Rel. Lien v. HouseOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State v. WestOhio Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API