Legal Opinion

Tate v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 7, 2000No. 99-1233PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANNABELLE Clinton Imber, Justice.

The natural father ststepmother ice. appeal the Randolph County Chancery Court’s decision to grant the minors’ maternal grandmother visitation rights. On appeal, appellants Scott and Mary Ennis Tate contend that the action by appellee Jo Bennett seeking visitation rights under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-9-215(a)(l) (Repl. 1998) was barred by the one-year statute of limitations in Ark. Code Ann. § 9-9-216(b) (Repl. 1998). We agree and reverse and dismiss.

Scott and Cheryle Tate were a married couple with two children, Savanah and Jay Tate. On January 4, 1993, Cheryle…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Priest v. PolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Cox v. StaytonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Dougan v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Swaffar v. SwaffarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Graves v. Greene CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Henry v. BuchananSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. In Re Adoption of M.K.C.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. In Re Adoption of M.K.C.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API