Legal Opinion

Clay v. Tyson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for York county. Tried below before Norval, J.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

By the petition filed in the district court by defendant in error, it was alleged substantially, that plaintiff in error (defendant below) was the father of one Seth H. Clay, who,before the time of making the alleged promises, was a citizen of York county. That the said Seth was indebted to defendant in error (plaintiff below) in the sum of $200, evidenced by two promissory notes of Seth of $100 each, both of which were due. That Seth was the owner of a large amount of personal property in York county. That said property was transferred to plaintiff in error by said Seth, in consideration of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Fitzgerald v. MorrisseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Ellwood v. MonkNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Romberg v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Clopper v. PolandNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farley v. PeeblesNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Lincoln Joint Stock Land Bank v. BextenNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Plano Manufacturing Co. v. FrawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Chena Lumber & Light Co. v. LaymonDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1910
  5. Estate of Allen v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API