Legal Opinion
Waltmon v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided April 17, 2002No. 09-01-282 CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RONALD L. WALKER, Chief Justice.
The record before us reflects that appellant pleaded guilty without benefit of an agreed recommendation of punishment with the State. Appellant elected to have a jury assess his punishment. With appel*150lant’s plea of guilty to Aggravated Sexual Assault in Cause No. 9136JD, the indictment in Cause No. 9137JD, also an Aggravated Sexual Assault, was dismissed by the State. Following the presentation of evidence to the jury by both sides, the jury assessed appellant’s punishment at confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — Institutional…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Brian Douglas Barnstein v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- Brian Douglas Barnstein v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
- Dandrea McGree v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
- Hernandez, Homero HerreraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.