Legal Opinion
In the Matter of J.M.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided October 23, 2003No. 13-02-139-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice VALDEZ.
Appellant, J.M., III, appeals from the juvenile court’s modified order of disposition committing him to the Texas Youth Commission. Through four issues appellant argues: (1) the evidence presented was legally insufficient to support the trial court’s findings that he violated the terms of his probation; (2) the evidence was also factually insufficient; (3) the trial court erred in allowing a witness to testify; and (4) appellant received ineffective assistance of counsel. Because we conclude the evidence presented was legally insufficient to support the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stanfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- In re H.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- In re L.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- In re J.L.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- In re M_ HCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tony Dorsett Hille v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2012
- in the Matter of J. A. S., III, a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- in the Matter of J. A. S., III, a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
- in the Matter of J. L. E., a Juvenile, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
- in the Matter of K. D. B., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.